Adam Sullivan is running as a Democrat for Congress in New York's Eight District (Manhattan/Brooklyn). He is challenging Jerrold Nadler--Chairman of the Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Civil Liberties--in the Democratic primary based upon Mr. Nadler's failure to pursue impeachment of Cheney and Bush. Paid for by Sullivan for Congress
Fellow Patriots,
Forgive me for telling this story so late following the events of last Friday, but as our campaign winds down the rest of my life (work,work, work) has been catching up with me. But this story tickles me, and I just wanted to share it with all of you. For context, you should be familiar with Jim McCabe's post on the campaign blog, "Nadler Operatives Nuke Sullivan Petitions."
With the challenges to our petitions coming from the Nadler camp, and the prima facie finding by the BoE that I am not a properly enrolled Democrat, notification of a hearing at the Kings County Supreme Court had been issued. Having received the notification, I contacted our legal counsel for one last piece of advice: "Should I go to this hearing, and if so, what should I say?" Our counsel had made clear earlier that we stood no real chance of being on the ballot, and that to default on the hearing would simply confirm a withdrawal of my candidacy. He had also mentioned, though, that going to the hearing might offer an opportunity to grandstand one last time on the impeachment issue. (Sometimes the press is there, he said.)
Let's look at some the events of the last few days, to see what they have in common:
1) Dennis Kucinich introduced a single new article of impeachment against the president, for his and his administration's lying us into a disastrous and illegal war;
2) Karl Rove not only failed to appear before the HJC on Thursday after being subpoenaed, but he skipped the country without notifying Congress(!);
3) Nancy Pelosi, in her signature style (vague, ambiguous, and vague again), made a statement which seemed to leave the door open for impeachment hearings (back on the table?);
4) I, Adam Sullivan, filed well in excess of the number of required petition signatures to gain ballot access for the Democratic primary here in NYC, where I am challenging Jerrold Nadler for his seat representing New York's Eighth Congressional District in the House.
From my perspective, this is a strong list of reasons for Mr. Nadler--who chairs the Subcommittee of the Judiciary on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Civil Liberties--to change his position on seeking to initiate impeachment hearings.
My name is Adam Sullivan. Until recently, I was just another citizen of New York's 8th Congressional District. Now I am running for Congress as a challenger to Jerrold Nadler for nomination in CD8 by the Democratic Party. And I need your help.
You may legitimately ask why I would challenge Congressman Nadler, a representative with a long liberal voting record. While this is true, Nadler has failed us all where it matters most.
The issue--Impeachment
Some months ago, I joined a pro-impeachment group with the intent of encouraging my congressman to co-sponsor the Articles of Impeachment introduced in the House by Dennis Kucinich of Ohio.
· Bill Richardson officially nominated for Secretary of Commerce (Oreo)
· GA-Sen: Counties to Watch (Senate Guru)
· Obama to Have Presser for Richardson for Commerce Secretary Tomorrow (fbihop)
· Clinton officially nominated for Sec of State (Oreo)
· News from the MN blogosphere (MN Campaign Report)
· GA-Sen: Saxby Chambliss Doesn't Care About You (Senate Guru)
· Final Iowa statehouse races resolved (desmoinesdem)
· GA-Sen: More on the bus (lpackard)
· MN-Sen: Why is Norm Coleman challenging so many more ballots? (MN Campaign Report)
· Southwest to be Climate Change "Pearl Harbor"? (fbihop)
· NV-Sen: Krolicki Accuses Reid of Orchestrating an Indictment (Sven at My Silver State)
· GA-Sen: On the bus part 2 (lpackard)